I went for a walk in the park Wednesday and saw crocuses blooming and cherry trees budding and high school gym classes out running and it really seemed as if spring is coming to New York, a great city that deserves a break. An excellent story by William Finnegan in last week’s New Yorker opens a window on the Democratic incompetence and squalid corporate corruption that frustrates all attempts to replace Penn Station. Every Democrat should read it.
This hellhole sits in Midtown making millions of people miserable, and nobody in power holds out any prospect of success, meanwhile the Democratic Party is plagued with progressives out to prove their purity by winning defeat.
I live on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, populated by liberals who read the Times religiously and grieve for the sorrows of the world and then comfort ourselves with an $8 croissant and a cup of premium Ecuadorian rain-forest coffee with oat milk. As an old lib, I felt obliged to go to a play Wednesday night about homelessness, which had no story line, just a good deal of suffering onstage (then in the audience), some shouting, weeping, most of it incomprehensible, but the audience worked diligently to appreciate it and gave it a partial standing ovation.
The Times, of course, gave it a rave review (“heartbreaking”) and the critic, who had the advantage of having read the script, managed to find a sort of narrative, but to us groundlings, it was ninety minutes of sheer misery, like sitting on the floor of Penn Station waiting for a train and being hustled by panhandlers and crazy people, but given our upbringing, we felt guilty for not enjoying it.
Well, I refuse to go to the theater and pay to be punished.
The theater is for entertainment. It can be light or dark but it must have a story and be comprehensible and engage the audience and take them someplace. The Times critic found it meaningful that the actors glared at the audience — it “implicates the audience,” he said. Well, I’m not implicated: I didn’t write this play. I’m not responsible for making hundreds of people waste an evening.
I grew up in Minnesota so I was brought up to be nice. I have never raised my voice except at athletic events. I do not complain to the person at the drive-up window that the onion rings seem to be day-old rings. When I call to refill a prescription, I say “Thank you” to the clerk and I’m gratified if, instead of “No problem,” she says, “You’re welcome.” It means she was brought up as I was. “No problem” is a brush-off. “You’re welcome” is a kindness. But I am ashamed of myself for not walking out of that play.
My fellow Minnesotans may imagine New Yorkers as pushy and rude but they’ve never ridden the C train during rush hour with a hundred people in a lurching car standing a few inches from each other and avoiding contact. An exercise of extreme delicacy. Sometimes a homeless person comes into a car and makes a pitch for money. People listen. But the homeless person needs to have a story that is understandable and succinct, and if it is, people will put money in the hat. It’s not enough to just glare at people.
I go to church and if, one Sunday, Father Dylan lashes into us for our indifference to the poor, I will accept it up to a point if the man seems Spirit-driven, shouts, weeps, is passionate to the point of lunacy. But I won’t pay $75 to go to the theater and be glared at. That’s just privileged people flagellating themselves with dental floss.
The social justice movement is very appealing. There’s no need to march and carry signs — that ended decades ago — now you just check the boxes and click on LIKE and you’re in. This is likely to wipe out comedy and lead to more dreadful theater, perhaps a play about climate change in a theater full of smoke and the thermostat set at 105. Actors moving through the audience jabbing people with plastic forks.
Raise the minimum wage to $15. Fix the health care system to provide drug rehab. Rebuild Penn Station. Enough with the charades. Be real.
Well said. The phrase "no problem" has become so commonplace, however, that I feel it's a generational thing (I say this as a 40 year old!) and don't see it as a brush-off. I was brought up to say "you're welcome" but over time "no problem" has made it's way into my vocabulary, and as a person who has spent time behind a counter, I assure you, it has just as much meaning and sincerity behind it.
Just as I wouldn't see those who spoke a native language in another country in which I was the tourist as disrespect to my English speaking tongue, I wouldn't take offense around younger people using such a mild version of slang expressing gratitude. Now, their customer service in all other regards, on the other hand, is on them, but maybe in a busy shop, the only thing there is for customer service are the pleasantries. I cannot judge.
Southerners calling me "bud" however, will never sit well with me, and I'm from the south!
There was a time when persons on both sides of the political pendulum laughed. Sometimes they were moved to tears. These were always things that could be shared, "across the aisle." These story things are human things that humans still like, even after millenia.
Our forefathers could get up and walk out of the cave if the wall drawings didn't connect or the poor firelight distracted audience attention from the intrigue of the hunt. Sometimes playwrights need to starve. It's called learning. Word gets around despite critics trying to inflate preachy drivel masquerading as theater.
We're still human. We can turn to media that engages,. We have a choice. Next time, get your sorry 80 year old butt up and out. Better yet, exercise some up-front discernment. Consider the critique or the track record of who made it and avoid their recommendation entirely. Sometimes critics need to starve. It's called learning.
With what we don't feed the above, maybe we can feed the homeless.